Would Hitlary Have Erased THIS Email?

Probably.

Since I don't have my own mail server, I reckon I won't.

Work email. A place for serious technical writing.

Most times.

Then there's stuff like I write, when it isn't reporting an event that management probably wishes they didn't need to know about, but would be mad if someone didn't tell them about.

At woik today I posted the following "How Questions Is Answered" email:

How Questions Is Answered.

Sorta.

Tornadoes have been plucking chickens long before humankind knowd about it. As humankind became aware of the phenom, most dismissed it with a shrug, “eh” or “that’s messed up”.

Not Elias Loomis.

In 1842, this visionary lost sleep at work whilst pondering what kind of tornado would take the time to pluck chickens. With enough lost sleep, he changed the question to how strong must be thine tornadic winds what are required to pluck a chicken.

To test his hypothesis – he couldn’t spell it – Loomis acquired a chicken, a powder charge and a 6 pounder cannon.

Loomis loaded the cannon with the powder charge. Then the chicken. The chicken thought it’d be the first to experience the thrill of flight without the risk of losing its luggage via Newark.

At the firing of the cannon, the chicken lost all love of flight...feathers...any worries about lost luggage.

And any resemblance to a chicken.

After an extensive search for and examination of the chicken con carnage, Loomis concluded that the chicken left the cannon at a velocity of 342 mph.

And from this, he concluded that tornadoes cannot work at KFC.

To this day, no tornado has EVER been hired by KFC.  



Stupor Volunteers of Hitlary are probably going nuts about now...I won't be nice to their Marxist lying broad.

They might be wise to take a hint:



But I don't  ;-) 

HRC's Super Volunteers Guarantee This

Before the day before the day before, I  had never heard of "hrc Super Volunteers".  Perhaps they're a small group of people that help hrc squeeze into those pants suits.

That'd be a brave volunteer, indeed.

Whatever the make up and extent of the grope...er...group, one of them sent a nyt reporter a warning email that basically said the following:

We will be watching, reading, listening and protesting coded sexism..." and went on to tell what those "coded sexism words" are:

 "polarizing, calculating, disingenuous, insincere, ambitious, inevitable, entitled, over confident,  secretive, will do anything to win, represents the past, out of touch..."

They ended on this saber-rattling flourish:  "You are on notice that we will be watching, reading, listening and protesting coded sexism".  

 

 

I imagine that they had the spooky violin from the movie Beetlejuice playing in the background as they decomposed this.

 

 

Even though I consider the mindless group hrc Super Volunteers to be of dubious antecedence that hump one another's legs for fun, I can't but congratulate them on a master stroke:  they believe they have just intimidated the lamestream servile mediocres into NOT using those words to describe the Hil.

 

My pet rock, Seymour, is rolling around the floor at his current visitation abode in West Virginia, laughing what passes for his ass off.

 

 

Since the hrc Stuper Volunmousketeers didn't warn me, I reckon that leaves me free to use every one of those words that just happens to fit hrc better than her pants suits do.

 

hrc IS polarizing.

hrc IS calculating.

hrc IS disingenuous.

hrc IS insincere.

hrc IS ambitious.

hrc certainly DOES consider herself inevitable.

hrc absolutely BELIEVES herself to be entitled.

hrc likely IS overconfident.

If hrc is anything, there's NO QUESTION that she's secretive.

Damn straight that hrc WILL DO anything to win.

hrc DEFINITELY represents the past in all the worst ways.

And finally, hrc IS out of touch.


Okay, hrc Stupor Volunmouseketeers....anything ELSE you won't allow us to say about Hil?   I mean after all, what difference will it make?